After this story and it's source,

**sup-rbeast** · October 20th, 2008, 10:55 AM

who can actually take fox news seriously...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,440945,00.html

**imported_elp6n** · October 20th, 2008, 10:56 AM

The online Sun. Quite reliable indeed dontcha say...

**sup-rbeast** · October 20th, 2008, 10:57 AM

Bout as reliable as Bill O'Riley..lol

**R13** · October 20th, 2008, 02:45 PM

He's fair and balanced, what are you talking about? lol

**NotSoSilentBob** · October 20th, 2008, 04:09 PM

What bearing does that report (which is a result of declassified MI5 documents) have on the veracity of arguments concerning Fox News?

**imported_elp6n** · October 20th, 2008, 08:55 PM

hmm the AP picked it up
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27279684/

**plantsman** · October 20th, 2008, 09:15 PM

So that justifies it? Not sure what you're saying here...

**imported_elp6n** · October 21st, 2008, 09:13 AM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: boney</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So that justifies it? Not sure what you're saying here...</div></div>
I know you're anti-MSNBC. You've made that point so many times we've lost count.
That wasn't an MSNBC story. It was an Associated Press story that MSNBC picked up to run (along with other press).

I pointed out that link since people are talking about "fair and balanced" reporting. The AP isn't right-wing or left-wing. The AP just reports. They don't say "oh this is true so true" it's just reporting.

**sup-rbeast** · October 21st, 2008, 09:14 AM

It was from the SUN for christ sake...that's lower than the enquirer.

**imported_elp6n** · October 21st, 2008, 09:15 AM

The first link was the Sun (isn't that the originator of "Bat Boy"?)
The second link was AP.

I just wanted to add that link for the conversation value.

For what it's worth, I don't believe what the guy is claiming and am not defending the content of the story! [img]/LDPforum/ubbthreads/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smile.gif[/img]